The following points are presented as assertions appearing in the materials submitted by the payor (Terry). They are not findings of fact. Full names are replaced by aliases. This is not legal advice.
以下要点为付款人（Terry）所提交材料中出现的主张。它们并非事实认定。完整姓名已替换为化名。本页不构成法律建议。
Note on sensitive claims: Statements concerning mental health, substance use, or medical conditions are recorded only as asserted by one party. No independent medical verification appears in the public materials hosted here.
敏感主张说明：有关心理健康、物质使用或医疗状况的陈述，仅作为一方主张予以记录。此处公开材料中未见独立医学核实。
Terry states that he holds a master’s degree in education from Beijing Normal University and worked as an engineer at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences at the time of marriage and the birth of the child.
Terry主张其持有北京师范大学教育学硕士学位，并在结婚及子女出生期间于中国社会科学院担任工程师。
Terry asserts that Lily has long exhibited suspicious and distrustful behavior, suffers from severe depression, and has become dependent on medication or substances. He states that he opposes transfer of large cash sums because he believes such funds would be used in ways that endanger her health and would leave the child (Harry) without a biological mother.
Terry主张Lily长期表现疑神疑鬼的言行，患有严重抑郁症，并已对药物或物质产生依赖。他表示反对支付大额现金，因为他认为此类资金会被用于危及其健康的方式，最终使孩子（Harry）失去生母。
Address referenced in multiple documents: 102-1065 72nd Avenue West, Vancouver, BC V6P 3C4. Terry asserts this property represents substantially all of the material provision he was able to make for Lily. Court inquiry records (Chinese proceedings) contain statements in which Lily is recorded as acknowledging that she did not contribute the down payment; the property and related debts were addressed in the mediation discussion. The 2015 BC order also identifies this address as the family home and awards the claimant sole ownership subject to the mortgage.
多份文件中出现的地址：102-1065 72nd Avenue West, Vancouver, BC V6P 3C4。Terry主张该房产基本上是他能够给予Lily的全部物质安排。中国程序中的询问笔录记载Lily承认未支付首付款；房产及相关债务在调解讨论中被提及。2015年BC命令亦将此地址列为家庭住所，并将所有权判给申请人（需承担抵押贷款）。
The Chinese court inquiry record (pages marked 24–25) contains competing statements about the periods each parent cared for the child (from birth to approximately age 5½). Separation is stated to have begun in 2010. These statements form part of the factual background of the later mediation.
中国法院询问笔录（标注第24–25页）包含双方关于子女从出生至约5岁半期间照料时段的不同陈述。分居据称始于2010年。这些陈述构成后续调解的事实背景部分。
← Back to Home / 返回首页 | View Remittance Compilation / 查看汇款汇总 →